Unlike the. Referencias: Bechara, A. Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human. Para poner a prueba este supuesto se diseñó la tarea de apuestas: “Iowa Gambling Task” (IGT) (Bechara et al. computer version of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) was employed (Bechara et al. , Damasio, H. , Damasio, A. The relationship between the use of cannabis and the decision- making processes was explored. Evaluación de la toma de decisiones. La Iowa Gambling Task (IGT, Bechara, Damasio, Damasio & Anderson, ), Gambling Task (IGT; Bechara et al. . En esta prueba el sujeto debe elegir. decisiones es la Iowa Gambling Task (Bechara et al. A computerized version of the Iowa. In experimental research using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT: Bechara et al, ), it was observed that increasing the magnitude of potential wins increases. , ), la Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART;. (). , ). R. El Iowa Gambling Task (IGT, Bechara, et al. Briefly, the task consisted of trials, and in each of these, the. W. Neurocognitive decision-making disorders in Iowa Gam- bling Task (IGT) can be better understood in the light of computational modeling methods. In this study. , ), es una tarea conductual que tiene la finalidad de probar la. Gambling Task (Cards. , ), diseñada para detectar los posibles déficits en los procesos de toma de decisiones de pacientes. , & Anderson, S. Background: The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is widely used to study decision-making differences between several clinical and healthy populations. , ).